A readable history.
Consumption, dates, units, and the limits of the available record.
Bill-based reporting / Small property portfolios
Make sense of the use.
Know what to ask next.
Higher daily use.
A question worth investigating.
Reporting service in development.
No new hardware required for the proposed first review.
Inside a Water Use Review
Fictional property / Two billing periodsTwo bills cover the same property, over different lengths of time. Put the daily figures beside the totals to see the change more clearly.
Explore the complete samplePeriod A 30 days
24,000US gallons billedPeriod B 35 days
31,500US gallons billedChange in daily use
The billed total rose 31.3%. The second bill also covered five more days.
Check occupancy, irrigation, weather context, and known work before assigning a cause.
Fictional records. This example does not establish a cause, diagnose a leak, or show measured savings.

For the places you look after
Readable records and local knowledge belong together. A useful question should make sense to the people who know the property.
The proposed Water Use Review
A bill-based reporting concept for small commercial-property portfolios. Periodic records become a clearer view of use and a practical follow-up question.
REPORTING SERVICE / NO NEW HARDWARE REQUIREDConsumption, dates, units, and the limits of the available record.
Account for billing duration before reading a change in totals.
Keep the next check clear and its result open until someone responds.
Periodic reporting has limits. It does not provide real-time leak alerts, establish water safety, or prove conservation savings. No live meter feed or actual customer results are claimed.
See what the example includes ↗